THE INTERSECTION OF BRAIN SCIENCE & HUMAN POTENTIALPartner with us
neurofeedback.com
The newsletter
← Research & Evidence
MixedSecondary analysis of a randomized double-blind sham-controlled pilot trial

Pain Outcomes and Exercise Data from the EXERT-Stroke Pilot Clinical Trial on Post-Stroke Headaches.

Pain severity and interference decreased modestly across nine participating veterans. Because the abstract does not separate active from sham results, it cannot show that rTMS caused the improvement.

Dagli C, Morgan CJ, McGregor K, Lin C.
Restorative neurology and neuroscience · Publication date: 2026-09-10
Added to site: 2026-09-11
DOI: 10.1177/09226028261486597

First-publication date from the authoritative indexed record.

Modalities
TMS
Clinical focus
Stroke, Headache, Pain
Population
Veterans with persistent post-stroke headache
Sample
9 participants
Intervention / method
Ten supervised sessions combining standardized aerobic exercise with active or sham rTMS over eight weeks
Comparator
Sham rTMS within the underlying pilot; the reviewed abstract reports overall changes rather than an active-versus-sham effect

Clinician summary

Overall mean decreases were 1.2 points for pain severity and 1.0 for interference. Baseline blood pressure measures correlated with improvement, but no active-versus-sham treatment estimate is reported in the abstract.

How to interpret the findings

Very small secondary analysis, overall rather than between-arm outcome reporting, concurrent exercise and no durability estimate. Feasibility does not establish efficacy.

Equipment and disclosures

rTMS was combined with standardized aerobic exercise; stimulation equipment details were not verified from the abstract.

Funding and competing-interest disclosures were not verified from the reviewed abstract.

Related evidence

Compare findings from the same clinical area, including mixed results.

Abstract checked · Checked 2026-09-11

Summary prepared with AI assistance. Source verification does not imply an independent replication or a clinician's endorsement. Read our review method.