THE INTERSECTION OF BRAIN SCIENCE & HUMAN POTENTIALPartner with us
neurofeedback.com
The newsletter
← Research & Evidence
Positive with limitationsSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Acupuncture combined with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation vs repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation alone for recovery of hemiparesis after ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Combining acupuncture with rTMS was associated with better motor and daily-living scores than rTMS alone. Differences among trials and limited safety reporting mean the result should guide further evaluation, not guarantee an individual outcome.

Li G, Yue M, Fan S, Bai Q, Li S, Yang X, Chen X, Zhou Y, Zhong J, Shi J.
Neuroscience · Publication date: 2026-09-06
Added to site: 2026-09-11
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2026.08.052

First-publication date from the authoritative indexed record. A contributor-designation corrigendum was published October 23, 2026; it did not change the study methods or results.

Modalities
TMS
Clinical focus
Stroke, Motor recovery, Activities of daily living
Population
Patients with hemiparesis after ischemic stroke
Sample
30 trials with 3,261 participants
Intervention / method
Acupuncture combined with rTMS
Comparator
rTMS alone

Clinician summary

Combination treatment favored Fugl-Meyer total, upper- and lower-extremity scores and Barthel Index. Heterogeneity was substantial for lower-extremity results, and only a small number of trials reported adverse events.

How to interpret the findings

The abstract does not provide trial-level risk-of-bias details, protocol consistency or follow-up durability. Sparse adverse-event reporting limits safety conclusions.

Equipment and disclosures

rTMS and acupuncture protocols varied across included trials; device and coil details were not resolved from the abstract.

Funding and competing-interest disclosures were not verified from the reviewed abstract.

Publication correction

Corrigendum published October 23, 2026: Mengqi Yue and Shuochen Fan should have been designated as equal first authors. The correction does not change the reported methods or results.

Read the correction ↗

Related evidence

Compare findings from the same clinical area, including mixed results.

Abstract checked · Checked 2026-10-25

Summary prepared with AI assistance. Source verification does not imply an independent replication or a clinician's endorsement. Read our review method.