THE INTERSECTION OF BRAIN SCIENCE & HUMAN POTENTIALPartner with us
neurofeedback.com
The newsletter
← Research & Evidence
Positive with limitationsPRISMA systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of randomized trials

Photobiomodulation Irradiation Protocols for Burning Mouth Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Protocol-Level Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Across 18 randomized trials, PBM was associated with less burning-mouth pain and better oral-health-related quality of life. Results varied substantially for pain, and the review could not identify one best treatment protocol.

Ok SM, Lee M.
Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery · Publication date: 2026-09-21
Added to site: 2026-09-21
DOI: 10.1177/25785478261484370

Electronic publication date verified in Europe PMC.

Modalities
Photobiomodulation, Low-level laser therapy
Clinical focus
Burning mouth syndrome, Pain, Oral health quality of life
Population
People with burning mouth syndrome enrolled in randomized PBM or low-level-laser trials
Sample
18 randomized trials; total participant count was not reported in the accessible abstract
Intervention / method
Meta-analysis of PBM or low-level-laser effects with exploratory subgroups for irradiation parameters
Comparator
Randomized trial control conditions; comparator details varied and were not provided in the abstract

Clinician summary

Pooled pain improved by a mean 1.09 points with high heterogeneity (I² = 89%), and OHIP-14 improved by 3.82 points with I² = 41%. Xerostomia and depression were not significantly improved, anxiety showed a modest reduction, and protocol subgroup signals were exploratory.

How to interpret the findings

The abstract did not report the total denominator, risk-of-bias results, comparator composition, pain scale harmonization, adverse events or evidence certainty. High pain heterogeneity and exploratory protocol analyses prevent a validated optimal wavelength, dose or schedule.

Equipment and disclosures

PBM or low-level-laser wavelengths, power, fluence, timing, frequency, duration and application modes varied across the included trials and were not itemized in the accessible abstract.

Funding and competing-interest details were not available in the checked indexed record.

Related evidence

Compare findings from the same clinical area, including mixed results.

Abstract checked · Checked 2026-09-21

Summary prepared with AI assistance. Source verification does not imply an independent replication or a clinician's endorsement. Read our review method.