THE INTERSECTION OF BRAIN SCIENCE & HUMAN POTENTIALPartner with us
neurofeedback.com
The newsletter
← Research & Evidence
Positive with limitationsRandomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial

Motor Cortex rTMS Alleviates Pain and Comorbid Depression After Spinal Cord Injury with a Correlate in M1 Intracortical Inhibition.

Pain improved more after active rTMS than after sham in this small two-week study. Depression and anxiety improved within the active group, but those changes did not differ significantly from sham.

Lu Y, Zhao K, Liu X, Lin X, Xue B, Zhang X, Li R, Feng F, Ding W, Sun X, Yuan H.
Journal of pain research · Publication date: 2026-09-10
Added to site: 2026-09-17
DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S627677

First electronic publication date from the authoritative indexed record. Crossref supplies September 2026 without a day.

Modalities
rTMS, TMS
Clinical focus
Spinal cord injury, Neuropathic pain, Depression
Population
Adults with neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury
Sample
29 participants; 22 active and 7 sham
Intervention / method
Ten-hertz rTMS over left M1 hand area, 1,200 pulses at 80% resting motor threshold, once daily for two weeks
Comparator
Sham coil orientation with matched auditory stimulation

Clinician summary

Baseline-adjusted post-treatment pain favored active rTMS (P = 0.040). Between-group differences were not significant for PHQ-9, GAD-7, SICI or ICF, despite significant within-active-arm changes.

How to interpret the findings

The sham arm included only seven people, confidence intervals were wide, follow-up ended immediately after two weeks and the full text did not report treatment-specific adverse-event results.

Equipment and disclosures

CCY-1 stimulator with a figure-of-eight coil from Yiruide Medical Equipment Company, Wuhan, China, as reported in the full text.

The authors declared no competing interests. The full text reports support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the Shaanxi Provincial Key Research and Development Program.

Related evidence

Compare findings from the same clinical area, including mixed results.

Full text checked · Checked 2026-09-17

Summary prepared with AI assistance. Source verification does not imply an independent replication or a clinician's endorsement. Read our review method.