THE INTERSECTION OF BRAIN SCIENCE & HUMAN POTENTIALPartner with us
neurofeedback.com
The newsletter
← Research & Evidence
Positive with limitationsPRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis using robust-variance meta-regression

A PRISMA-compliant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Late Positive Potential in Depression.

Across 51 studies, depression was associated with a small reduction in the brain's late positive response to positive material. This group-level pattern is not a diagnostic test or an individual treatment guide.

Santopetro NJ, Thompson B, El Jamal C, Brush CJ, Schmidt B, Hajcak G.
Biological psychology · Publication date: 2026-09-18
Added to site: 2026-09-19
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2026.109386

Online-ahead-of-print publication date verified in PubMed.

Modalities
EEG, ERP
Clinical focus
Depression, Late positive potential, Emotional processing
Population
Published and unpublished depression-related LPP studies from 1981 through 2024
Sample
51 studies with 4,517 participants
Intervention / method
Meta-analysis of LPP responses to positive, negative and neutral stimuli, with moderators for experimental methods, clinical characteristics and demographics
Comparator
LPP effect sizes across depression status or severity, stimulus valence and study-level moderators

Clinician summary

Robust-variance meta-regression found a small significant negative association between depression and positive-stimulus LPP, stronger in early windows and adults. Comorbid internalizing samples also showed a small negative association for negative-stimulus LPP.

How to interpret the findings

The accessible abstract does not provide risk-of-bias results, heterogeneity estimates, publication-bias analyses or diagnostic performance. Small group-level ERP effects, varied paradigms and moderator findings do not establish specificity, causality or individual prediction.

Equipment and disclosures

The meta-analysis covered studies of the EEG late positive potential; equipment and acquisition methods varied across the included literature and were not detailed in the accessible abstract.

The authors declared no known competing financial interests or personal relationships. Funding was not reported in the checked indexed record.

Related evidence

Compare findings from the same clinical area, including mixed results.

Abstract checked · Checked 2026-09-19

Summary prepared with AI assistance. Source verification does not imply an independent replication or a clinician's endorsement. Read our review method.