THE INTERSECTION OF BRAIN SCIENCE & HUMAN POTENTIALPartner with us
neurofeedback.com
The newsletter
← Research & Evidence
Positive with limitationsSystematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of double-blind parallel-group randomized trials

Efficacy and safety of noninvasive brain stimulation for ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind randomized controlled trials across international English and Chinese databases.

Pooled findings favored brain stimulation for ADHD symptoms, but effects varied markedly. The review does not support routine clinical use.

Cui H, Wang G, Wang S, Tang R, Li Y, Jiang W, Wei Y, Zhang T, Xu L, Jiang L, Wang J, Li C.
Psychiatry research · Publication date: 2026-09-19
Added to site: 2026-09-23
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2026.117464

Electronic publication date verified in Europe PMC; first indexed 2026-09-23. This source date is separate from the site's addition date.

Modalities
rTMS, tDCS, Transcranial nerve stimulation
Clinical focus
ADHD, Clinical symptoms
Population
Participants with ADHD; ages and subgroup denominators were unavailable in the abstract
Sample
15 studies, 17 comparisons and 746 participants
Intervention / method
Multiple noninvasive brain-stimulation protocols
Comparator
Sham stimulation

Clinician summary

The pooled standardized mean difference was -1.12 (95% CI -2.05 to -0.19; I²=94%). rTMS subgroup findings were promising; tDCS and nerve stimulation were not significant. Dropout and adverse-event differences were not significant.

How to interpret the findings

High heterogeneity limits the pooled estimate. Subgroup signals do not establish an optimal protocol, and absence of significant adverse-event differences does not prove safety.

Equipment and disclosures

Various devices; no vendor-specific efficacy established.

Funding and competing-interest details were not available in the checked indexed record.

Related evidence

Compare findings from the same clinical area, including mixed results.

Abstract checked · Checked 2026-09-23

Summary prepared with AI assistance. Source verification does not imply an independent replication or a clinician's endorsement. Read our review method.