THE INTERSECTION OF BRAIN SCIENCE & HUMAN POTENTIALPartner with us
neurofeedback.com
The newsletter
← Research & Evidence
MixedSystematic review and meta-analysis

Neurofeedback for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The overall analysis found no meaningful improvement in ADHD symptoms when using probably blinded ratings. Small effects in some protocol and processing-speed analyses warrant further study.

Westwood SJ, Aggensteiner PM, Kaiser A, Nagy P, Donno F, Merkl D, Balia C, Goujon A, Bousquet E, Capodiferro AM, Derks L, Purper-Ouakil D, Carucci S, Holtmann M, Brandeis D, Cortese S, Sonuga-Barke EJS, European ADHD Guidelines Group (EAGG).
JAMA psychiatry · Publication date: 2025-02-01
Added to site: 2026-09-09
DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.3702

Journal issue date from the indexed record; this should not be read as a verified first-online date.

Modalities
Neurofeedback
Clinical focus
ADHD
Population
Participants with ADHD, ages 5–40
Sample
38 randomized trials; 2,472 participants
Intervention / method
Neurofeedback protocols across randomized trials
Comparator
Control conditions varied

Clinician summary

Probably blinded total-symptom ratings showed no significant benefit: SMD 0.04, 95% CI −0.10 to 0.18. Restricted standard-protocol analyses and processing speed showed small favorable effects.

How to interpret the findings

Protocol and outcome differences matter. Positive subgroup findings should not replace the overall result or be treated as established individual-response predictors.

Equipment and disclosures

Equipment details were not verified from the reviewed abstract.

Funding and competing-interest disclosures were not verified from the reviewed abstract.

Related evidence

Compare findings from the same clinical area, including mixed results.

Abstract checked · Checked 2026-09-09

Summary prepared with AI assistance. Source verification does not imply an independent replication or a clinician's endorsement. Read our review method.