THE INTERSECTION OF BRAIN SCIENCE & HUMAN POTENTIALPartner with us
neurofeedback.com
The newsletter
← Research & Evidence
Positive with limitationsRandomized controlled trial

Is neurofeedback an efficacious treatment for ADHD? A randomised controlled clinical trial.

Parent and teacher ratings favored neurofeedback over computerized attention training in this trial. Later research provides a more mixed picture of ADHD outcomes.

Gevensleben H, Holl B, Albrecht B, Vogel C, Schlamp D, Kratz O, Studer P, Rothenberger A, Moll GH, Heinrich H.
Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · Publication date: 2009-01-12
Added to site: 2026-09-09
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02033.x

Publication date recorded by Europe PMC; online and issue dates may differ.

Modalities
Neurofeedback
Clinical focus
ADHD
Population
Children with ADHD
Sample
102 children, ages 8–12
Intervention / method
36 sessions combining theta/beta and slow cortical potential training
Comparator
Computerized attention-skills training

Clinician summary

The randomized trial reported a between-group effect size of 0.60 for its primary parent-rated ADHD outcome after training.

How to interpret the findings

An active training comparison is not sham neurofeedback. Rater expectations and protocol differences matter; consult the later ADHD meta-analysis in this library.

Equipment and disclosures

Equipment details were not verified from the reviewed abstract.

Funding and competing-interest disclosures were not verified from the reviewed abstract.

Related evidence

Compare findings from the same clinical area, including mixed results.

Abstract checked · Checked 2026-09-09

Summary prepared with AI assistance. Source verification does not imply an independent replication or a clinician's endorsement. Read our review method.