Personalized Brain Stimulation based on Brain Oscillations: A Systematic Review of MEG- and EEG-informed Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS).
A systematic review mapped 143 experiments that personalized tACS from EEG or MEG. Most individualized stimulation frequency, especially alpha, while relatively few personalized timing or electrode placement.
Sharifzadeh S, Jouzdani AF, Souki A, Brunoni AR, Marques DB, Ebrahimi M, Ghobadi-Azbari P, Pariz A, Soleimani G, Yavari F, Khosrowabadi R, Violante IR, Ekhtiari H.
Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · Publication date: 2026-09-20
Added to site: 2026-09-21
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2026.106991
Electronic publication date verified in Europe PMC.
- Modalities
- EEG, MEG, tACS, Personalized stimulation
- Clinical focus
- Brain oscillations, Closed-loop stimulation, Cognition
- Population
- Human EEG- or MEG-informed individualized tACS studies published through January 2024
- Sample
- 78 publications comprising 143 experiments: 128 EEG-informed and 15 MEG-informed
- Intervention / method
- Individualized tACS frequency, timing or montage selected from participant-specific EEG or MEG measures
- Comparator
- Sham-controlled and active-control experiments were summarized separately
Clinician summary
Frequency-based individualization accounted for 93% of experiments. Significant positive outcomes were reported in 77.9% of sham-controlled experiments and 56.2% with active controls, a contrast that supports stronger active-control designs rather than proving a pooled treatment effect.
How to interpret the findings
The accessible abstract reports proportions of experiments with significant outcomes, not pooled effect sizes, risk-of-bias results or evidence certainty. Studies varied by population, outcome, control and parameter-selection method. The literature search ended in January 2024, so newer work was not included.
Equipment and disclosures
The review covered EEG- and MEG-informed tACS studies with varied recording and stimulation systems; individual manufacturers and devices were not itemized in the accessible abstract.
Funding and competing-interest details were not available in the checked indexed record.
Related evidence
Compare findings from the same clinical area, including mixed results.
- Multimodal evidence associated with 20Hz rTMS in AD: neuroaxonal injury reduction, neural oscillatory rebalancing, and multilayer network integration · Positive with limitations
- Synergistic modulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and precuneus enhances cognitive recovery in mild cognitive impairment: A multimodal neuroimaging study · Positive with limitations
- Transcranial infrared laser stimulation produces beneficial cognitive and emotional effects in humans. · Positive with limitations
- The potential of infra-low frequency neurofeedback training in peak performance: The first double-blinded placebo-controlled longitudinal study in healthy adults. · Neutral / negative
- Clinical efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions on cognitive improvement in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. · Positive with limitations
- Brain state-contingent stimulation to probe task-dependent functional networks. · Positive with limitations
- Bilateral Angular Gyrus 810-nm Transcranial Near-Infrared Stimulation Reshapes Brain Network: Ameliorate Alzheimer's Disease Cognitive Deficits. · Positive with limitations
- Effects and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cognitive outcomes in mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis · Positive with limitations
- Multimodal Neurorehabilitation Including Auditory EEG Neurofeedback: A Proof of Concept Tested After Resection of a Giant Olfactory Groove Meningioma · Positive with limitations
- Temporal-Targeted Accelerated 40 Hz tACS Enhances Cognitive Function and Network Integration in Alzheimer's Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial. · Positive with limitations
Summary prepared with AI assistance. Source verification does not imply an independent replication or a clinician's endorsement. Read our review method.