THE INTERSECTION OF BRAIN SCIENCE & HUMAN POTENTIALPartner with us
neurofeedback.com
The newsletter
← Research & Evidence
Positive with limitationsRandomized controlled four-group single-session study

High-frequency rTMS over supplementary motor or primary motor cortex on reach-to-grasp in Parkinson's disease: A randomised controlled trial.

Supplementary motor area stimulation improved selected reach-to-grasp planning and coordination measures immediately after one session. The study does not show whether benefits last or translate into daily function.

Thanakamchokchai J, Saengphatrachai W, Khacharoen S, Phuegsilp P, Srivanitchapoom P, Pitakpatapee Y, Pakaprot N, Fisher BE, Tretriluxana J.
Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · Publication date: 2026-09-11
Added to site: 2026-09-18
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2026.2112404

First electronic publication date verified in PubMed and Europe PMC; indexed September 17, 2026.

Modalities
rTMS, TMS
Clinical focus
Parkinson's disease, Motor planning, Reach-to-grasp
Population
People with mild-to-moderate Parkinson's disease
Sample
36 participants; 9 per group
Intervention / method
One 20-minute session of 10-Hz high-frequency rTMS over supplementary motor area, primary motor cortex, both sites or sham
Comparator
Sham stimulation and active comparisons across supplementary motor area, primary motor cortex and combined targeting

Clinician summary

SMA stimulation improved association time lag in the non-barrier condition and produced superior planning gains versus sham across conditions. Execution did not differ significantly between groups, and combined stimulation offered no additive benefit.

How to interpret the findings

Each group contained nine participants, only immediate single-session effects were tested, and the accessible abstract does not report adverse events, longer follow-up or equipment details. Within-group execution changes should not be mistaken for between-group benefit.

Equipment and disclosures

The stimulation device, coil model and dose relative to motor threshold were not specified in the accessible abstract.

The authors declared no known competing financial interests or personal relationships. Funding was not available in the checked indexed record.

Related evidence

Compare findings from the same clinical area, including mixed results.

Abstract checked · Checked 2026-09-18

Summary prepared with AI assistance. Source verification does not imply an independent replication or a clinician's endorsement. Read our review method.