THE INTERSECTION OF BRAIN SCIENCE & HUMAN POTENTIALPartner with us
neurofeedback.com
The newsletter
← Research & Evidence
Positive with limitationsHuman technical proof-of-concept

Real-time measurement instead of prediction enables high-precision phase-specific stimulation of the human brain.

A real-time system triggered TMS close to the intended EEG phase without predicting ahead. This is an engineering result, not evidence of better treatment outcomes.

Guggenberger R, Negahbani F, Gebühr JS, Keute M, Gharabaghi A.
NeuroImage · Publication date: 2026-09-09
Added to site: 2026-09-10
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.122216

First-publication date from the authoritative indexed record.

Modalities
EEG, TMS, Closed-loop stimulation
Clinical focus
Brain stimulation, Brain health
Population
Human participants receiving EEG-triggered TMS
Sample
Not reported in the reviewed abstract
Intervention / method
Prediction-free EEG phase measurement and TMS triggering with a 1 ms update cycle across 4 to 40 Hz
Comparator
Intended target phases across eight phases and ten frequencies; no clinical control arm

Clinician summary

Across 4 to 40 Hz, mean stimulation phase was 5.6 degrees from target; typical single-pulse error was 3.7 degrees and trial-to-trial variability was 7.8 degrees.

How to interpret the findings

Participant count, detailed controls and commercial device information were unavailable in the reviewed abstract. The study reports targeting precision, not clinical efficacy.

Equipment and disclosures

EEG-triggered transcranial magnetic stimulation was described; specific commercial equipment was not verified from the abstract.

Funding and competing-interest disclosures were not verified from the reviewed abstract.

Related evidence

Compare findings from the same clinical area, including mixed results.

Abstract checked · Checked 2026-09-10

Summary prepared with AI assistance. Source verification does not imply an independent replication or a clinician's endorsement. Read our review method.