THE INTERSECTION OF BRAIN SCIENCE & HUMAN POTENTIALPartner with us
neurofeedback.com
The newsletter
← Research & Evidence
Positive with limitationsOpinion article and narrative synthesis

Neurofeedback for functional neurological disorders: future directions for research and clinical practice.

The paper explains why neurofeedback deserves careful study as an adjunct in FND care. It does not show that neurofeedback is already an effective treatment for FND.

Di Basilio D, Casson AJ, Jones A.
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · Publication date: 2026-09-17
Added to site: 2026-09-17
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2024.0468

Publication date verified through PubMed citation data and the Crossref record.

Modalities
Neurofeedback, EEG
Clinical focus
Functional neurological disorder, Research methods, Personalization
Population
People with functional neurological disorder are the proposed target population for future studies
Sample
Not applicable; no new participant study
Intervention / method
Proposed research framework covering targets, modality, training dose, transfer assessment and integration with physiotherapy
Comparator
Not applicable

Clinician summary

The authors connect network-level FND models with related neurofeedback literature and propose transparent target selection, protocol reporting, transfer testing and patient-centered integration within multidisciplinary care.

How to interpret the findings

Direct empirical evidence in FND is limited, methods vary across conditions and modalities, and no new clinical outcomes are reported.

Equipment and disclosures

No specific neurofeedback device was evaluated. The article discusses EEG and fMRI neurofeedback as distinct research modalities.

Funding and competing-interest details were not available in the checked indexed abstract.

Related evidence

Compare findings from the same clinical area, including mixed results.

Abstract checked · Checked 2026-09-17

Summary prepared with AI assistance. Source verification does not imply an independent replication or a clinician's endorsement. Read our review method.