THE INTERSECTION OF BRAIN SCIENCE & HUMAN POTENTIALPartner with us
neurofeedback.com
The newsletter
← Research & Evidence
Positive with limitationsSingle-case experimental series

Infra-slow EEG neurofeedback for insomnia: a single-case experimental study in primary care.

Some participants reported better sleep after training, but responses varied. Improvements partly moved back toward baseline at three months, and wearable sleep measurements showed limited agreement.

Edvardsson A, Smith MG, Rolstad SE, Steingrimsson S, Enriquez-Geppert S, Balt K, Landahl J, Weineland S.
Frontiers in human neuroscience · Publication date: 2026-07-16
Added to site: 2026-09-09
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2026.1832178

Publication date recorded by Europe PMC; online and issue dates may differ.

Modalities
Neurofeedback, ISF
Clinical focus
Insomnia
Population
Primary-care patients with insomnia and related comorbidities
Sample
10 enrolled; 9 completed; 8 analyzed
Intervention / method
Two-week baseline followed by 12 weekly individualized ISF sessions
Comparator
Within-person baseline; no external control group

Clinician summary

Five of eight analyzed participants had significant Tau-U changes in subjective sleep quality. Group PSQI and PHQ-9 scores improved post-treatment, with partial reversal at follow-up.

How to interpret the findings

Very small uncontrolled series with heterogeneous responses. Feasibility and preliminary symptom changes do not establish efficacy.

Equipment and disclosures

Equipment details were not verified from the reviewed abstract.

Funding and competing-interest disclosures were not verified from the reviewed abstract.

Publication correction

An August 21, 2026 correction removed an erroneously added institutional affiliation. The correction does not report a change to study findings.

Read the correction ↗

Related evidence

Compare findings from the same clinical area, including mixed results.

Abstract checked · Checked 2026-09-09

Summary prepared with AI assistance. Source verification does not imply an independent replication or a clinician's endorsement. Read our review method.