THE INTERSECTION OF BRAIN SCIENCE & HUMAN POTENTIALPartner with us
neurofeedback.com
The newsletter
← Research & Evidence
Positive with limitationsNarrative review informed by a structured literature search

Personalizing sleep therapy: Integrating EEG neurofeedback into the sleep disorders management.

The review describes promising improvements in reported sleep quality and some objective sleep measures. The underlying studies were generally small and varied, so neurofeedback has not been established as a replacement for CBT-I.

Shirolapov I, Bazanova O, Zakharov A.
Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice · Publication date: 2026-05-04
Added to site: 2026-09-13
DOI: 10.1080/08869634.2026.2666591

Historical addition: first published May 4, 2026, not new September research.

Modalities
Neurofeedback, EEG
Clinical focus
Insomnia, Sleep
Population
Studies of EEG neurofeedback for insomnia and sleep-related outcomes
Sample
16 original studies selected from 179 identified records
Intervention / method
EEG neurofeedback protocols varied across the included studies
Comparator
Comparators varied; the abstract does not report how many studies were controlled

Clinician summary

A 2014 to 2025 search yielded 16 original studies for descriptive synthesis. The authors report favorable subjective and objective signals, particularly in primary insomnia, while calling for standardized multicenter controlled trials.

How to interpret the findings

Narrative rather than quantitative synthesis; small studies, heterogeneous protocols and limited long-term data. The abstract does not provide study-level risk-of-bias assessment, pooled effects or comparative efficacy against CBT-I.

Equipment and disclosures

Equipment details were not verified from the abstract.

Funding and competing-interest disclosures were not verified from the abstract.

Related evidence

Compare findings from the same clinical area, including mixed results.

Abstract checked · Checked 2026-09-13

Summary prepared with AI assistance. Source verification does not imply an independent replication or a clinician's endorsement. Read our review method.