THE INTERSECTION OF BRAIN SCIENCE & HUMAN POTENTIALPartner with us
neurofeedback.com
The newsletter
← Research & Evidence
Positive with limitationsRandomized, double-blind, sham-controlled crossover experiment

Infra-low-frequency neurofeedback alters EEG network efficiency: exploratory evidence from healthy volunteers.

One session produced an exploratory EEG network signal during active training, offering a useful lead for future studies rather than evidence of symptom improvement.

de Matos NMP, Stämpfli P, Seifritz E, Brügger M.
NeuroImage · Publication date: 2026-07-30
Added to site: 2026-10-07
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.122155

First published online July 30, 2026; the October issue date is later. Added October 7, 2026 as a historical addition.

Modalities
Neurofeedback, EEG, ILF/ISF
Clinical focus
Functional connectivity, Neurofeedback mechanisms
Population
Healthy adult volunteers
Sample
39 analyzed EEG datasets
Intervention / method
One session of infra-low-frequency neurofeedback with continuous 31-channel EEG; connectivity estimated with debiased weighted phase-lag index and graph measures
Comparator
Verum versus sham feedback within a randomized crossover design

Clinician summary

Beta1 global efficiency was higher during verum than sham in the primary comparison. The effect did not survive correction across five bands, and no consistent differences appeared in other bands or betweenness centrality.

How to interpret the findings

Healthy-volunteer, single-session and exploratory study. The Condition by Block interaction was not significant, the principal signal did not survive Bonferroni correction across bands, and no clinical symptoms, durability or treatment benefit were tested.

Equipment and disclosures

Continuous 31-channel EEG; manufacturer was not verified from the checked abstract.

The indexed conflict statement reports no commercial or financial relationships. Funding details were not verified from the checked abstract.

Related evidence

Compare findings from the same clinical area, including mixed results.

Abstract checked · Checked 2026-10-07

Summary prepared with AI assistance. Source verification does not imply an independent replication or a clinician's endorsement. Read our review method.