THE INTERSECTION OF BRAIN SCIENCE & HUMAN POTENTIALPartner with us
neurofeedback.com
The newsletter
← Research & Evidence
MixedRandomized sham-controlled trial

Cerebellar Theta-Burst Stimulation Induces Distinct Functional Connectivity Patterns in Post-Stroke Aphasia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Adding cerebellar theta-burst stimulation to speech-language therapy did not improve the overall aphasia score significantly more than sham. A repetition measure favored active stimulation, pointing to a narrower signal that needs confirmation.

Wang X, Xu X, Wang D, Huang G, Zheng K, Chen C, Jiang D, Gao F, Ren C, Zhao Z.
Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · Publication date: 2026-09-29
Added to site: 2026-09-30
DOI: 10.1177/15459683261479722

Electronic publication date verified in Europe PMC and Crossref. This source date is separate from the site's addition date.

Modalities
rTMS, TMS
Clinical focus
Post-stroke aphasia, Language rehabilitation, Functional connectivity
Population
Patients with subacute post-stroke aphasia
Sample
51 participants: 25 assigned to real cTBS and 26 to sham stimulation
Intervention / method
Ten sessions over two weeks of inhibitory continuous theta-burst stimulation over right cerebellar Crus I or sham, with speech-language therapy in both groups
Comparator
Sham stimulation plus the same speech-language therapy

Clinician summary

Both groups improved. The WAB-AQ group-by-time interaction did not reach significance (p=0.058), while repetition favored cTBS (p=0.034). Resting-state fMRI showed heterogeneous rCrus I connectivity changes, and connectivity change was negatively correlated with language gains in the active group.

How to interpret the findings

The trial was small and short. The primary overall language outcome was not significant, while the positive repetition result was one domain among several outcomes. Imaging correlations and subgroup patterns were exploratory and require larger prespecified replication.

Equipment and disclosures

Continuous theta-burst stimulation targeted right cerebellar Crus I; coil model, neuronavigation details and speech-language therapy materials were not available in the checked abstract.

Crossref reports support from the Top Talent Support Program for young and middle-aged people of Wuxi Health Committee and the Social Development Project of Jiangsu Province. Competing-interest statements were not available in the checked abstract.

Related evidence

Compare findings from the same clinical area, including mixed results.

Abstract checked · Checked 2026-09-30

Summary prepared with AI assistance. Source verification does not imply an independent replication or a clinician's endorsement. Read our review method.