THE INTERSECTION OF BRAIN SCIENCE & HUMAN POTENTIALPartner with us
neurofeedback.com
The newsletter
← Research & Evidence
MixedAnalyst-blinded randomized crossover study

Acute Psychophysiological Effects Of 4-7-8 And Nadi Shodhana Breathing: A Randomized Crossover Study.

Brief breathing practices showed some favorable stress and mood responses, but conventional HRV measures did not significantly improve by condition.

Avcık FE, Koç F, Aktop A.
Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback · Publication date: 2026-09-22
Added to site: 2026-09-23
DOI: 10.1007/s10484-026-09811-8

Electronic publication date verified in Europe PMC; first indexed 2026-09-23. This source date is separate from the site's addition date.

Modalities
Breathing training, HRV
Clinical focus
Stress, Affect, Autonomic physiology
Population
University students, not a clinical treatment sample
Sample
34 university students: 19 men and 15 women
Intervention / method
Three 10-minute conditions separated by one-week washouts: 4-7-8 breathing, alternate-nostril breathing and resting breathing
Comparator
Counterbalanced within-person resting-breathing condition

Clinician summary

Subjective responses interacted with sex: 4-7-8 favored women and alternate-nostril breathing favored men. The study did not demonstrate corresponding condition effects on SDNN, RMSSD or LF/HF.

How to interpret the findings

Small sample, acute outcomes and subgroup uncertainty. No longer-term autonomic adaptation or specific brain-heart mechanism established. This was breathing practice, not feedback-guided HRV training; adverse-event detail was unavailable.

Equipment and disclosures

Polar H10 recordings at 1000 Hz analyzed with Kubios and artifact correction.

Funding and competing-interest details were not available in the checked indexed record.

Related evidence

Compare findings from the same clinical area, including mixed results.

Abstract checked · Checked 2026-09-23

Summary prepared with AI assistance. Source verification does not imply an independent replication or a clinician's endorsement. Read our review method.