THE INTERSECTION OF BRAIN SCIENCE & HUMAN POTENTIALPartner with us
neurofeedback.com
The newsletter
← Research & Evidence
Neutral / negativeSingle-center randomized double-blind sham-controlled crossover exploratory pilot trial

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in drug-resistant epilepsy: A randomized, sham-controlled crossover trial with exploratory EEG and MRI response phenotyping.

Active ear stimulation did not reduce seizures more than the sham condition in this small, carefully blinded pilot. Exploratory EEG and MRI patterns may help researchers study why responses differ, but they do not yet identify who will benefit.

Hong SJ, Yang SY, Bok EK, Lee JC, Kim Y, Min K, Shon YM.
Epilepsia open · Publication date: 2026-10-06
Added to site: 2026-10-09
DOI: 10.1002/epi4.70354

Published October 6, 2026. Added to Neurofeedback.com October 9, 2026.

Modalities
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation, EEG
Clinical focus
Drug-resistant focal epilepsy, Exploratory response phenotyping
Population
People with drug-resistant focal epilepsy
Sample
14 randomized participants
Intervention / method
Eight weeks of active taVNS and eight weeks of sham stimulation in randomized sequence, separated by a four-week washout; resting-state EEG at baseline and protocol end with exploratory structural MRI comparisons
Comparator
Sham auricular stimulation within participants

Clinician summary

Mean seizure-reduction ratios were 46.26% during active stimulation and 48.62% during sham, for a within-subject difference of -2.37 percentage points (p=0.604). Greater occipital and frontal beta attenuation correlated with active-specific benefit after false-discovery adjustment, while MRI responder comparisons were uncorrected and exploratory.

How to interpret the findings

Only 14 participants were studied at one center, the primary efficacy comparison was null, sham response was substantial and the imaging analyses were exploratory. MRI group comparisons were uncorrected, biomarker associations do not establish predictive validity, and the short phases do not establish durable benefit or safety.

Equipment and disclosures

The study used the allears taVNS device manufactured by TODOC Co., Ltd.; this attribution is retained because it is disclosed by the source and is not an endorsement.

Supported by Korean government ICT and National Research Foundation grants and Samsung Medical Center's Future Medicine 2030 Project. Author Kyousik Min is an employee of TODOC Co., Ltd., manufacturer of the study device; the remaining authors declared no conflicts.

Related evidence

Compare findings from the same clinical area, including mixed results.

Abstract checked · Checked 2026-10-09

Summary prepared with AI assistance. Source verification does not imply an independent replication or a clinician's endorsement. Read our review method.