THE INTERSECTION OF BRAIN SCIENCE & HUMAN POTENTIALPartner with us
neurofeedback.com
The newsletter
← Research & Evidence
Positive with limitationsProspective, single-center, open-label, uncontrolled naturalistic cohort

Clinical outcomes following five-day accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation for treatment-resistant depression in routine clinical practice: A prospective naturalistic cohort study

Published October 15, 2026. A five-day accelerated schedule was feasible in routine care and symptom scores improved through two months, but the uncontrolled study cannot show that stimulation caused the changes.

Khanna A, Espiritu A, Zhu L, Blair M, Giovannetti O, Abate A, Knight J, Deutsch L, Waxman R, Burhan AM.
CNS Spectrums · Publication date: 2026-10-15
Added to site: 2026-10-16
DOI: 10.1017/s1092852926101205

First published online October 15, 2026.

Modalities
TMS
Clinical focus
Treatment-resistant depression, Accelerated iTBS, Routine clinical practice
Population
Adults with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder or bipolar II disorder
Sample
46 participants with longitudinal data; mean age 44.3 years and 54.4% male
Intervention / method
Thirty iTBS sessions of 600 pulses each over five days, separated by 50-minute intervals, with post-treatment and two-month follow-up.
Comparator
No sham or untreated control group

Clinician summary

HAMD-17 response was 28.3% post-treatment and 37.0% at two months; remission was 26.1% and 32.6%. PHQ-9 and GAD-7 also improved. Transient, non-serious stimulation-site pain was the most common adverse event.

How to interpret the findings

Single-center open-label cohort without sham, no randomized efficacy estimate, 46 participants and only two months of follow-up. Bipolar II and major-depression participants were combined.

Equipment and disclosures

The abstract did not identify a verified device manufacturer. No BrainMaster attribution.

Funding and conflicts were not available in the checked abstract. No correction, retraction or concern relation appeared in the Crossref record; this is a bounded check. AI-assisted review.

Related evidence

Compare findings from the same clinical area, including mixed results.

Abstract checked · Checked 2026-10-16

Summary prepared with AI assistance. Source verification does not imply an independent replication or a clinician's endorsement. Read our review method.